Is your plan focused on demolition or construction?

Is your plan focused on tearing down or building up?

I once sat in on an executive meeting where two board members were at complete odds. The CFO wanted to cut costs. Lower expenses, a smaller team, and higher margins within the quarter. The CMO wanted to invest. In the brand, in customer relationships, and in things that wouldn't show a return for years.

Both were right. That was exactly what made it so difficult.

The CEO ultimately had to choose. Not between two financial models, but between two fundamentally different ideas about what leadership actually is.

Two types of reasoning

The CFO reasoned from the numbers. Costs, margins, return on investment.
Everything outside of that—the well-being of employees, relationships with partners, the impact on the community—was just noise. Variables that could disrupt the outcome, rather than the outcome itself.

The CMO reasoned from a different perspective. They saw an organization that runs on trust, not just numbers. People who have been around for years and built up their expertise. Customers who have had a relationship with the brand for decades. A community that gives the company space to exist—not as a given, but because it has proven itself to be a good neighbor.

Both lines of reasoning can yield results over time. 

Tearing down is easy. Building up is not.

It won't surprise you, but most people find it easier to form an opinion than to develop a vision. The same applies to these kinds of choices. Cutting costs is a math problem. Managing more tightly is a matter of exercising power and control. It often produces faster results, and that quick result is often rewarded more quickly.

Investing requires a different way of calculating. It requires you to accept something whose return will only become visible later. It requires giving people autonomy instead of control, because creativity and commitment cannot be forced from a spreadsheet. You build trust through consistent behavior over years. However, you can also tear it down quickly in just a few months.

Where most CEOs still have room to grow

What I often see when these kinds of discussions take place: the CFO gets the final word, not because the argument is stronger, but because it is more quickly measurable. You can put a cost saving in a report tomorrow. An investment in trust only shows up in two to three years.

That is not the most intelligent way to choose. It confuses short-term results on paper with long-term value in practice.

In this case, the CEO understood that the value of his organization lies just as much in the trust of the people around it as it does in the results on the balance sheet.

True leaders don't tear things down to save them. They build up, together with the people who do the work, the customers who have been loyal for years, and the community that ultimately pays the price if that balance is neglected.

‍